Home | The GMAT Pill Method | GMAT Stories | Table of Contents | FAQs | GMAT Verbal | Resume/Essays | RC Videos | Member Login
-
GMAT Prep Software Question Video Explanation 4 | Practice GMAT Questions

Watch This: GMAT Prep Question With GMAT Pill Video ExplanationQuestion:
The three women, liberal activists who strong support legislation in favor of civil rights and environmental protection, have consistently received labor’s unqualifying support.A) have consistently received labor’s unqualifying support
B) are consistently receiving the unqualifying support of labor
C) have consistently received the unqualified support of labor
D) receive consistent and unqualified support by labor
E) are receiving consistent and unqualified support by laborWhat is this GMAT question testing?
This question test word structure–specifically the order of words.
Do you say:
“received labor’s unqualifying support”
or
“receiving the unqualifying support of labor”
or
“receive consistent and unqualified support”This question also tries to complicate things further by adding what we here at GMAT Pill call “fluff.” The purpose of FLUFF is to slow you down in the GMAT test marathon. If you can quickly identify where the fluff is, you’ll be that much better off in terms fo timing for the real exam.
Watch this video above to find out how to think about this question.
How To Think Through This Official Guide Question
Go ahead and check out the GMAT Pill video explanation of this Official Guide Question.
Check out More Practice GMAT Questions with GMAT Pill explanations.
Table of Contents | See Pricing
Verbal Videos: Sentence Correction | Critical Reasoning | Reading Comprehension
Quant Videos: Problem Solving | Data Sufficiency -
Official Guide To GMAT: DS#77
OG #77:Each week a certain salesman is paid a fixed amount equal to $300, plus a commission equals to 5 percent of the amount of his sales that week over $1,000. What is the total amount the salesman was paid last week?(1) The total amount the salesman was paid last week is equal to 10 percent of the amount of his sales last week.
(2) The salesman’s sales last week totaled $5,000.
—————-
GMATPill Explanation
OK, so you know the rule: Total Number * Percentage = Actual Number
The question is asking “what is the total amount the salesman was paid.”—this means you need the dollar amount.At a quick glance, you can see that (1) gives you a PERCENTAGE and (2) gives you a NUMBER.
So right off the bat, I am leaning towards (B) as the answer. But let’s make sure.
(2) tells us the salesman’s sales last week was $5,000. So how much did he make? Well, since he gets paid a fixed amount of $300 + commission%*(TotalSales – $1,000), you can easily calculate how much he gets paid since you now know the TotalSales from (2).
So that confirms (2) is good.What about (1)?
Well, (1) is a percentage, so we don’t know if it’s good. The framework does NOT tell us that (1) is automatically no good. It just tells us that (2) is almost definitely correct.So how do we go about evaluating (1)? Well, first take the information from the question stem and right down what you know.
You know the amount he was paid = $300 + .05(excess over $1,000) = $300 +.05(TotalSales-$1,000)
Now read (1). (1) says the amount he was paid = 10% of TotalSales.
So common sense, should tell you you should just set these two equations equal to each other like so:$300 + .05(TotalSales-$1,000) = .1(TotalSales)
Look at that! 1 Equation and 1 Unknown–which means this has a solution. Of course, don’t spend the time to solve this equation. But right away, you know you have enough information to find how much the guy was paid.
So (1) here is good as well.
In this case, both (1) and (2) are good.
Remember, when using this framework, you should be going through this thought process:
1) Since statement (2) has a number, it has a pretty high probability of being good.
2) Check to make sure that (2) makes sense—it does, so (2) is good.
3) Since statement (1) is a percentage, it has a pretty high probability of not being good, but not necessarily.
4) Write out any equations you know and see if you can somehow match things up
5) In this case, it turns out you can create a 1 equation/1 unknown scenario so statement (1) is also good.SInce (1) and (2) are both good by themself, then you choose (D) as your final answer.
And yes, you should always write out equations that involve a few moving parts.
To further clarify, the only reason why (1) in OG #77 is good even though it is a PERCENTAGE, is because:
the info in (1) is a PERCENTAGE of a variable that was previously mentioned in the question stem.
In particular, (1) tells us the “10% of the amount of sales last week”
This percentage is previously referenced in the question stem:
“commission equals to 5 percent of the amount of his sales last week”Do you see that? It’s a percentage of a variable that was previously mentioned.
Now compare OG#77 to the example in the video. The example in the video does NOT reference a variable previously mentioned in the question stem.
In the video, statement (2) says:
“The brokerage firm’s commission decreased the profit earned on the trade by 10%”
Ask yourself: Was “profit earned on the trade” a variable in the question stem?
Nope!So it’s safe to assume that this question is “normal” and you can confidently move forward with the framework quickly.
So in the future, be aware of when the percentage they give references a variable previously mentioned in the question stem. In these cases, you should double check and ask yourself if things make sense.
GMATPill vs Official Guide ExplanationNow, if you were to get an explanation from the Official Guide book itself, notice the difference in explanation depth and attack strategy compared to GMATPill’s explanation above. According to most students, the official guide explanations don’t really give them a good enough thought process to attack the question. And sometimes, it’s just difficult to follow.
For many students, the GMATPill explanation works a lot better.
More GMAT Questions
Table of Contents | See Pricing
Verbal Videos: Sentence Correction | Critical Reasoning | Reading Comprehension
Quant Videos: Problem Solving | Data Sufficiency -
GMAT Prep Software Question Video Explanation 3 | Practice GMAT Questions

Watch This: Official Guide Question With GMAT Pill Video ExplanationQuestion:
In an attempt to guarantee the security of its innovative water purification method, the company required each employee to sign a confidentiality agreement prohibiting that its water purification methods be disclosed to companies using an analogous purification process.A) prohibiting that its water purification methods be disclosed to companies
B) prohibiting them from the disclosing of its water purification methods to any company
C) prohibiting disclosure of its water purification methods to any company
D) that would prohibit them from disclosure of its water purification methods to companies
E) that would prohibit its water purification methods to be disclosed to a companyWhat is this GMAT question testing?
This question throws in singular vs. plural, some idiomatic phrases, and “it” references.
See if you can spot the pitfalls in this question and arrive at the correct one in as little time as you can.
Do you say:
“agreement prohibiting”
or do you say:
“agreement that would prohibit” ??Or is either one ok? Watch the video above to find out!
How To Think Through This GMAT Prep Software Question
Go ahead and check out the GMAT Pill video explanation of this Official Guide Question.
Check out More Practice GMAT Questions with GMAT Pill explanations.
Table of Contents | See Pricing
Verbal Videos: Sentence Correction | Critical Reasoning | Reading Comprehension
Quant Videos: Problem Solving | Data Sufficiency
-

Introduction -
Video Trailer
-
Student Success
-
Your MBA




