# GMAT Practice Questions

## Two-Part Analysis

This will be the most popular type of integrated reasoning question you'll see. In fact, you'll see roughly 4 out of the 12 integrated reasoning questions in this format.  At 2 minutes and 30 seconds per question, you should budget 10 minutes (out of the 30 total minutes for Integrated Reasoning) for two-part analysis questions.

Two-Part analysis can be either quant or verbal oriented. You'll be presented with two columns (2 parts) and you have to choose an answer choice to correspond with each of the two columns. Some two-part combinations include: Yes/No, True/False, Assumption/Conclusion, Positive/Negative, Prime/Non-Prime, or any other kind of custom-created column combination.

Remember, you'll need to get both parts of the two-part analysis section to get credit for the entire question. There will be a total of 12 integrated reasoning questions. About a third will be two-part analysis questions.

GMAT Practice Set # 1
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 1 : Number of Computer Science Teachers Matching Units 26481 47% View Show
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 2 : Disappearing Bees Infer 17245 67% View Show
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 3 : Google and Facebook Developers Constraints, Imaginary 3rd Column 27193 46% View Show
GMAT Practice Set # 2
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 4 : Racecar Gasoline Consumption Rate Matching Units 11559 70% View Show
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 5 : Intercollegiate Basketball Tournament Process 9026 72% View Show
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 6 : MangoBerry and PeachPlay Cause & Effect Cause and Effect 9127 68% View Show
GMAT Practice Set # 3
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 7 : Function with Two Variables Algebra 8705 46% View Show
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 8 : Fabric Manufacturers and Material Ratio Assumption 9985 30% View Show
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 9 : Employee Titles & Hierarchy Process 10494 32% View Show
GMAT Practice Set # 4
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 10 : Cardiac Surgeon & Lifestyle Cause and Effect 6843 47% View Show
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 11 : Cookie Jar Math Jointly Consistent, Algebra 9877 71% View Show
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 12 : Plane Takeoff Velocity Jointly Consistent, Algebra 9690 44% View Show
GMAT Practice Set # 5
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 13 : Number Sequences in Algebraic Terms Jointly Consistent, Algebra 4818 65% View Show
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 14 : Table Tennis Tournament Process 5805 57% View Show
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 15 : Coral Organisms Process 4454 66% View Show
GMAT Practice Set # 6
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 16 : Porcelain History Assumption 4097 52% View Show
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 17 : Custom Basketball Rules Process 5541 80% View Show
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 18 : MeTube Video Productions Process 4097 49% View Show
GMAT Practice Set # 7
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 19 : Credit Default Swap Dilemma Assumption 4337 33% View Show
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 20 : Beverage Store Testing Assumption 4359 31% View Show
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 21 : Child Isolationism Assumption 4279 40% View Show
GMAT Practice Set # 8
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 22 : Loan Mixtures Algebra; Mixtures 6050 65% View Show
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 23 : Quasi JX Matching Units 3554 78% View Show
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 24 : Morefa Must Happen, Must Not Happen 4604 44% View Show
GMAT Practice Set # 9
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 25 : Faculty and Students Matching Units 3032 69% View Show
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 26 : Literature Speakers Constraints, Imaginary 3rd Column 3494 68% View Show
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 27 : Rock Varnish Most Strongly Suggests is True (imply) 4115 23% View Show
GMAT Practice Set # 10
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 28 : Phytoplankton Cause and Effect 2800 77% View Show
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 29 : Function of A Algebra, Jointly Consistent 2852 58% View Show
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 30 : Porcelain Production Assumption 2742 71% View Show
GMAT Practice Set # 11
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 31 : Pottery Characteristics Cause and Effect 3208 40% View Show
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 32 : Right Circular Cylinder Jointly Consistent 3170 71% View Show
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 33 : Professor Think Tank Viewpoint 3137 34% View Show
GMAT Practice Set # 12
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 34 : Car Velocity Algebra, Jointly Consistent 2771 82% View Show
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 35 : Volcanic Emissions Cause and Effect 3332 22% View Show
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 36 : Geometric Knowledge in Children Strengthen/Weaken 3206 72% View Show
GMAT Practice Set # 13
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 37 : Absent Employee Constraints 3261 35% View Show
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 38 : Metro Ballet Process 3039 69% View Show
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 39 : Consultant's Claim Assumption 33817 72% View Show
GMAT Practice Set # 14
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 40 : Faculty and Students Algebra 3654 74% View Show
 GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 41 : Quasi JX Car Model 4612 79% View Show
GMAT Practice Set # 1
GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 1 : Number of Computer Science Teachers

Matching Units 26481 47% View Show
GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 2 : Disappearing Bees

Infer 17245 67% View Show
Constraints, Imaginary 3rd Column 27193 46% View Show
GMAT Practice Set # 2
GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 4 : Racecar Gasoline Consumption Rate
Matching Units 11559 70% View Show
GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 5 : Intercollegiate Basketball Tournament
Process 9026 72% View Show
GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 6 : MangoBerry and PeachPlay Cause & Effect
Cause and Effect 9127 68% View Show
GMAT Practice Set # 3
GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 7 : Function with Two Variables
Algebra 8705 46% View Show
GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 8 : Fabric Manufacturers and Material Ratio
Assumption 9985 30% View Show
GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 9 : Employee Titles & Hierarchy
Process 10494 32% View Show
GMAT Practice Set # 4
GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 10 : Cardiac Surgeon & Lifestyle
Cause and Effect 6843 47% View Show
GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 11 : Cookie Jar Math
Jointly Consistent, Algebra 9877 71% View Show
GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 12 : Plane Takeoff Velocity
Jointly Consistent, Algebra 9690 44% View Show
GMAT Practice Set # 5
GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 13 : Number Sequences in Algebraic Terms
Jointly Consistent, Algebra 4818 65% View Show
GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 14 : Table Tennis Tournament
Process 5805 57% View Show
GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 15 : Coral Organisms
Process 4454 66% View Show
GMAT Practice Set # 6
GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 16 : Porcelain History
Assumption 4097 52% View Show
GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 17 : Custom Basketball Rules
Process 5541 80% View Show
GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 18 : MeTube Video Productions
Process 4097 49% View Show
GMAT Practice Set # 7
GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 19 : Credit Default Swap Dilemma
Assumption 4337 33% View Show
GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 20 : Beverage Store Testing
Assumption 4359 31% View Show
GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 21 : Child Isolationism
Assumption 4279 40% View Show
GMAT Practice Set # 8
GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 22 : Loan Mixtures
Algebra; Mixtures 6050 65% View Show
GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 23 : Quasi JX
Matching Units 3554 78% View Show
GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 24 : Morefa
Must Happen, Must Not Happen 4604 44% View Show
GMAT Practice Set # 9
GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 25 : Faculty and Students
Matching Units 3032 69% View Show
GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 26 : Literature Speakers
Constraints, Imaginary 3rd Column 3494 68% View Show
GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 27 : Rock Varnish
Most Strongly Suggests is True (imply) 4115 23% View Show
GMAT Practice Set # 10
GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 28 : Phytoplankton
Cause and Effect 2800 77% View Show
GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 29 : Function of A
Algebra, Jointly Consistent 2852 58% View Show
GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 30 : Porcelain Production
Assumption 2742 71% View Show
GMAT Practice Set # 11
GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 31 : Pottery Characteristics
Cause and Effect 3208 40% View Show
GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 32 : Right Circular Cylinder
Jointly Consistent 3170 71% View Show
GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 33 : Professor Think Tank
Viewpoint 3137 34% View Show
GMAT Practice Set # 12
GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 34 : Car Velocity
Algebra, Jointly Consistent 2771 82% View Show
GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 35 : Volcanic Emissions
Cause and Effect 3332 22% View Show
GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 36 : Geometric Knowledge in Children
Strengthen/Weaken 3206 72% View Show
GMAT Practice Set # 13
GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 37 : Absent Employee
Constraints 3261 35% View Show
GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 38 : Metro Ballet
Process 3039 69% View Show
GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 39 : Consultant's Claim
Assumption 33817 72% View Show
GMAT Practice Set # 14
GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 40 : Faculty and Students

Algebra 3654 74% View Show
GMAT Two-Part Analysis # 41 : Quasi JX Car Model

4612 79% View Show

## Share your comments and favorite GMAT tips for this GMAT integrated reasoning section below.

Keep track of your answers to the above two part analysis questions by logging in. You can favorite questions for further review later. Each question has a video explanation so go ahead and click the "Show answer" link to load up the video explanation from GMAT Pill.

Each practice set is divided into sets of 3 questions so you can study in small chunks. After each practice set, you will be redirected back to this page where you can review your performance and find other questions to attempt.

### Two Part Analysis Pros

The two part analysis presents an opportunity for you to show off your critical reasoning skills. Granted the questions are not necessarily easier than the critical reasoning section itself, if logic is an area that you do well in, this section should be a little bit more beneficial for yourself and relatively less beneficial for everyone else you are competing with.

This question type is not limited to quant or verbal. You can see this question type in both forms.

### Two Part Analysis Cons

Some of the verbal focused two part analysis questions can be quite thought-intensive. Thankfully, some of the frameworks GMAT Pill has designed help to minimize the shock of seeing such a complicated question. On average, you should budget 2 minutes and 30 seconds for each of these questions.

The question type is a bit awkward for most people as you are presented with two columns. For each question, the columns can mean different things. Sometimes the two columns are completely independent and other times they are dependent. As an example, you might have two variables that both produce a favorable outcome. There are multiple possible answers for such a scenario. A two part analysis question can present answer choices such that your job is to pick the pair of numbers corresponding to each column that serve as one potential solution to the math problem presented. This is an example where the two columns are dependent upon one another.

In other cases, the columns may be independent of each other.

The types of columns may also be different. In one question, you might have one column indicating that something happened while the other column indicates something did not happen. In another question, one column is True and the other column is False. Because of such variation, we recommend looking carefully at exactly what is being asked for these questions as what they are asking may not be as intuitive as it should be.

### What It Means For You

Practice those reasoning skills as this section gives the GMAC folks more of an opportunity to test you on reasoning. If you have really good memory and you rely on memorizing formulas in math, or memorizing sentence structures - you're going to need to learn how to think differently. The GMAT is a reasoning test - not a memorization test. So make sure you are actually developing and honing in on your reasoning skills.

Get used to this question type and practice with it. Note you will have two answer responses for two part analysis question type.

## FAQs

### What does Two Part Analysis Test You On?

Two part analysis can test you on a variety of topics - it is not singled out to focus on any one particular area. For example, you can see both quant and verbal questions. The verbal ones will be heavily influenced by the logic elements you will see in the critical reasoning. Except in two part analysis, you're almost answering two questions in a row about the same topic. Each column must be matched with one of the 5 or 6 rows presented. Many of the rows will just be miscellaneous answers or consist of information this is not relevant to the question and would therefore not be marked as a potential answer for either column.

Besides critical reasoning questions on steroids, you will also see quant questions here. These are variations of problem-solving type questions that can range anywhere from algebra, to number properties, to word problems. So make sure you are able to change your thinking caps very quickly as one question you may see a verbal question and the next one may very well be a quant. And then the questions can switch back on the next one. On this section, it's all about staying nimble on your toes, but you also need to have the psychological stamina to muster through this section before you get to the main quant and verbal show.

### How much time should I dedicate to Two Part Analysis?

As mentioned in the 1 Month GMAT Study Plan, You should allocate at least 2 full days to the integrated reasoning section after you've finished all your other sections. We recommend doing this because the other sections all count towards your 800 score but this section does not. It's still important, but you want to first focus on the main verbal and quant show. Having said that, the integrated reasoning section will continue to have more and more importance as each year passes. With 2 full days, you'll have the opportunity to budget 3 sessions each day for a total of 6 sessions.

Remember, you should be breaking each full day into a morning, afternoon, and evening session -- each 2-3 hours long with breaks for lunch and dinner. Within integrated reasoning, we would recommend starting off with two part analysis because it is one of the more difficult sections and it involves a question type you may not be used to.

### Will my first integrated reasoning question be a two part analysis question?

Not necessarily. Keep in mind that the order of the types of questions you will see for integrated reasoning are completely random. One person might start off with two part analysis while another starts off with multi source reasoning (MSR).

Whatever the case may be, know that by the end of the 30 minutes, you will have had the opportunity to go through each of the four question types in the proportions mentioned on this site (most likely 3 or 4 two art analysis). Also keep in mind that there will be experimental questions that do not affect your score. You will never know which type of question these experimental questions will appear as and you will not be able to tell that the experimental question is indeed an experimental question.

 Question Explanation: