RC Passage: Price Reduction

  
Time 0 0 : 0 0 : 0 0

The fact that reducing price can generate a competitive advantage for a company does not mean that every reduction in price will create such an advantage. Price reduction, like improvement in service, must be balanced against other types of efforts on the basis of direct, tangible benefits such as increased revenues. If a company is already effectively on par with its competitors because it provides products at an acceptable price and keeps customers from leaving at an acceptable rate, then reduction in price may not be effective, since price is not necessarily the deciding factor for any customer in any situation. 

This truth was not apparent to managers of one operating system software vendor, which failed to improve its competitive position - despite its attempt to reduce price. The software managers did not recognize the level of customer inertia that arises from the inconvenience of switching operating systems. Nor did they analyze their reduction in price to determine whether it would attract new customers by producing a new standard of price that would excite customers or by proving difficult for competitors to copy.

The passage suggests that operating system software managers failed to consider whether or not the price reduction mentioned in the last sentence

(A)

was too complicated to be easily described to prospective customers

(B)

made a measurable change in the experiences of customers purchasing

(C)

could be sustained if the number of customers increased significantly

(D)

was an innovation that competing vendors could have imitated

(E)

was adequate to bring the vendor's general level of price to a level that was comparable with that of its competitors

GMATTM is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission CouncilTM. The Graduate Management Admission CouncilTM does not endorse, nor is it affiliated in any way with the owner or any content of this web site.