Home | The GMAT Pill Method | GMAT Stories | Table of Contents | FAQs | GMAT Verbal | Resume/Essays | RC Videos | Member Login

As seen on:     [More]
Free Stuff
See Pricing
Download 121 Page E-Book
  • GMAT Prep With Official Guide to GMAT 12th Ed: Last Critical Reasoning Question # 124 | GMAT Prep

    Critical Reasoning: Question #124
    Official Guide -12th Edition

    officialguide GMAT Prep With Official Guide to GMAT 12th Ed: Last Critical Reasoning Question # 124 | GMAT Prep
    #124: Museums that house Renaissance oil paintings typically store them in environments that are carefully kept within narrow margins of temperature and humidity to inhibit any deterioration. Laboratory tests have shown that the kind of oil paint used in these paintings actually adjust to climatic changes quite well. If, as some museum directors believe, paint is the most sensitive substance in these works, then by relaxing the standards for temperature and humidity control, museums can reduce energy costs without risking damage to these paintings. Museums would be rash to relax those standards, however, since results of preliminary tests indicate that gesso, a compound routinely used by Renaissance artists to help adhere to the canvas, is unable to withstand significant variations in humidity.

    In the argument above, the two portions in bold face play which of the following roles?

    A) The first is an objection that has been raised against the position taken by the argument; the second is the position taken by the argument.

    B) The first is the position taken by the argument; the second is the position that the argument calls into question.

    C) The first is a judgment that has been offered in support of the position that the argument calls into question; the second is a circumstance on which that judgment is, in part, based.

    D) The first is a judgment that has been offered in support of the position that the argument calls into question; the second is that position.

    E) The first is a claim that the argument calls into question; the second is the position taken by the argument.

    GMAT Pill Explanation For This GMAT Question | GMAT Prep

    The keyword is “If”

    IF X, THEN Y.
    Well, clearly, Y is the conclusion. Or in this question, they use a similar word “position.” So immediately, you can see the first bolded statement is X and the second bolded statement is Y. So you just browse through the answer choices where the first part leads into the second part.

    (A) uses the word “objection”–it’s not an objection so I don’t even bother reading the rest of the answer choice.

    (B) uses “position taken by the argument” –sounds fancy but really the “argument” is the entire paragraph. The “position” is basically the conclusion. So we know that’s what the SECOND statement is, NOT the first.

    (C) uses the word “judgment” which seems OK since the phrase “paint is the most sensitive substance in the works” is a judgment based on lab tests. The second part says it’s a “circumstance”—well that’s not what we’re looking for. We’re looking for something to the effect of a “conclusion.”
    So (C) is no good.

    (D) also uses the word “judgment” which is OK. The second half uses “position”—AHA! That’s what we want. Looks like (D) is the answer.

    Let’s check (E) just in case.
    (E) uses claim–which could be ok, but “claim that the argument calls into question” is a bit specific. What exactly does that mean? Is the author calling into question the claim that “paint is the most sensitive substance in these works?” No! The author is not questioning that. In fact, he’s using that claim to make/support yet another claim. So (E) is no good.

    So you can be confident and mark (D) as your answer. By spotting sentence structure IF….THEN… you can see that the first bold statement most lead into the second one. It would never contract the second one. In fact, it would support the second statement.

    Table of Contents | See Pricing

    Verbal Videos: Sentence Correction | Critical Reasoning | Reading Comprehension
    Quant Videos: Problem Solving | Data Sufficiency

  • Official Guide DS#55


    #55 OG
    I got answer E fairly quickly in like 30 seconds.

    —————————————

    Guy’s net income equals his gross income minus his deductions. By what percent did Guy’s net income change on January 1, 1989, when both his gross income and his deductions increased?

    (1) Guy’s gross income increased by 4 percent on January 1, 1989
    (2) Guy’s deductions increased by 15 percent on January 1, 1989

    —————————————

    GMATPill Explanation

    Here, the question is asking for “%”. You are not given any information except that gross income and deductions increased – we do not know the exact amount nor the %.

    If we look at (1) and (2) we see that this additional information is all “%’s” The question is, can we use this new % information to get our answer which is %? Possible, but we have to check.

    Gross Income – Deductions = Net income
    Gross Income (1+4%) – Deductions(1+15%) = Net Income

    We can see that even when we take both statements together we come to an equation that has 2 unknowns to get to our Net Income – those unknowns are Gross Income or Deductions. We either need their actual exact numbers or some expression that relates the two of them. We have neither in this case – answer is E, both statements are insufficient to answer the question.

    GMATPill vs Official Guide Explanation

    Now, if you were to get an explanation from the Official Guide book itself, notice the difference in explanation depth and attack strategy compared to GMATPill’s explanation above. According to most students, the official guide explanations don’t really give them a good enough thought process to attack the question. And sometimes, it’s just difficult to follow.

    OG DS55 Official Guide DS#55

    For many students, the GMATPill explanation works a lot better.

    Table of Contents | See Pricing

    Verbal Videos: Sentence Correction | Critical Reasoning | Reading Comprehension
    Quant Videos: Problem Solving | Data Sufficiency

  • GMAT Prep Question Video Explanation 6 | Practice GMAT Questions


    og screenshot6 GMAT Prep Question Video Explanation 6 | Practice GMAT Questions
    Watch This:GMAT Prep Question With GMAT Pill Video Explanation

    Question:
    Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.

    A) Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also
    B) Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also
    C) The systematic clearing of forests in the United States, creating farmland (especially in the Northeast) and giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also
    D) The systematic clearing of forests in the United States created farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also
    E) The systematic clearing of forests in the United States not only created farmland (especially in the Northeast), giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it

    What is this GMAT question testing?

    This question tests the infamous “Not only….but also” construction that the GMAT guys LOVE to use.

    You’re also expected to be able to identify inconsistencies in verb tenses in the context of long sentences.

    For example, notice the variations in verb tenses in the following two examples:
    “Not only did it create….but it also caused”
    “Not only does it create…but it also causes”

    The first one uses past tense verbs “did” and “caused.”
    the second one uses present tense verbs “does” and “causes.”

    But GMAT questions always try to complicate things.

    How do you know when to use
    “Not only ABC, but also XYZ”
    versus
    “Not only ABC, but it also XYZ” ?

    Well, the above is a perfect example testing you on this so check out the video above!

    And note that in answer B, it is not wrong because of the present/past tense. Past tense is actually OK here because the phrase “Not only DID….but it also DID THIS” implies a past tense to be used in the latter half of the sentence. So the past/present tense is not the issue here.

    For B, the issue is that “but also” should be “but it also” because the structure of this sentence is “Not only did it do this….but it also did this”. If we leave out the “IT”, it will somehow be a continuation of the phrase right before the comma…and in this case that wouldn’t make sense.

    The key is to figure out what the GMAT guys are testing you on and to move your eyeballs to the critical keywords ASAP so you can do the necessary analysis and choose the correct answer.

    How To Think Through This GMAT Prep Question

    Go ahead and check out the GMAT Pill video explanation of this Official Guide Question.

    Check out More Practice GMAT Questions with GMAT Pill explanations.

    Table of Contents | See Pricing

    Verbal Videos: Sentence Correction | Critical Reasoning | Reading Comprehension
    Quant Videos: Problem Solving | Data Sufficiency