Home | The GMAT Pill Method | GMAT Stories | Table of Contents | FAQs | GMAT Verbal | Resume/Essays | RC Videos | Member Login
-
GMATPill’s New GMAT Reading Comprehension Pill Due To Student Demand
Watch GMAT Reading Comprehension Video #1, and *NEW* Watch Video #2 Here
Due to popular and persistent demand, we will be releasing Reading Comprehension videos.
As you may already know, we originally stayed away from Reading Comprehension because we were not convinced we could produce something quality enough that we would feel comfortable releasing out into the public.
Well, so many of you asked for it that we just had to give it a second thought.
We created some preliminary videos and asked for student feedback.
The results?
Well, needless to say—they LOVED IT!
Watch Zeke Lee think through this Boring GMAT Reading Comprehension passage!
More Reading Comprehension videos will be Free for existing students—so make sure you sign up for GMATPill membership as soon as you can!
Take a look and let us know what you think! Check back again as we’ll be adding more. Email zeke@gmatpill.com and let us know when you want to be notified about more Reading Comprehension sneak peak videos.
OFFICIAL GUIDE READING COMPREHENSION
Passage #1 included below:
[GMATPill's Thought Process Explanation Here]Federal efforts to aid minority businesses began in the
1960′s when the Small Business Administration (SBA)
began making federally guaranteed loans and government-
sponsored management and technical assistance
available to minority business enterprises. While this
program enabled many minority entrepreneurs to
form new businesses, the results were disappointing,
since managerial inexperience, unfavorable locations,
and capital shortages led to high failure rates. Even 15
years after the program was implemented, minority
business receipts were not quite two percent of the national
economy’s total receipts.Recently federal policymakers have adopted an
approach intended to accelerate development of the
minority business sector by moving away from directly
aiding small minority enterprises and toward supporting
larger, growth-oriented minority firms through intermediary
companies. In this approach, large corporations
participate in the development of successful and stable
minority businesses by making use of government sponsored
venture capital. The capital is used by a
participating company to establish a Minority Enterprise
Small Business Investment Company or MESBIC. The
MESBIC then provides capital and guidance to minority
businesses that have potential to become future suppliers
or customers of the sponsoring company.MESBIC’s are the result of the belief that providing
established firms with easier access to relevant management
techniques and more job-specific experience, as
well as substantial amounts of capital, gives those firms
a greater opportunity to develop sound business foundations
than does simply making general management
experience and small amounts of capital available.
Further, since potential markets for the minority busi-
nesses already exist through the sponsoring companies,
the minority businesses face considerably less risk in
terms of location and market fluctuation. Following
early financial and operating problems, sponsoring
corporations began to capitalize MESBIC’s far above
the legal minimum of $500,000 in order to generate
sufficient income and to sustain the quality of management
needed. MESBIC’s are now emerging as increasingly
important financing sources for minority enterprises.Ironically, MESBIC staffs, which usually consist of
Hispanic and Black professionals, tend to approach
investments in minority firms more pragmatically than
do many MESBIC directors, who are usually senior
managers from sponsoring corporations. The latter
often still think mainly in terms of the “Social Responsibility
Approach” and thus seem to prefer deals that are
riskier and less attractive than normal investment criteria
would warrant. Such differences in viewpoint have produced
uneasiness among many minority staff members,
who feel that minority entrepreneurs and businesses
should be judged by established business considerations.
These staff members believe their point of view is closer
to the original philosophy of MESBIC’s and they are
concerned that, unless a more prudent course is followed,
MESBIC directors may revert to policies likely
to re-create the disappointing results of the original SBA
approach.Table of Contents | See Pricing
Verbal Videos: Sentence Correction | Critical Reasoning | Reading Comprehension
Quant Videos: Problem Solving | Data Sufficiency -
How to Reduce sqrt(264) Mentally – GMAT Quick Math
Hi, I was looking at this GMAT problem on the Beat the Gmat, I don’t understand how they deduce 2*sqrt(66) from the sqrt of 264? How are we supposed to know to do this?GMATPill Response
When I see 264 I notice first thing that it’s an even number. If it’s an even number that is divisible by 4, then I can break it up easily since I can do something like sqrt(4) * sqrt(?) = sqrt(264)
The sqrt(4) = 2, that’s easy. So then I would be left with 2*sqrt(?) = sqrt(264)
Well, what’s the question mark?
sqrt(4) * sqrt(?) = sqrt(264)
We need to divide 264 by 4. Take the first two digits 26 and divide it by 4. You can do that 6 times and that would give you 24.Do your long division. 26-24 = 2
Now add on the 4 digit and you get 24Divide 24 by 4 and you get 6 agaain.
So the two 6′s give you 66.
So sqrt(4) * sqrt(?) = sqrt(264)
becomes
sqrt(4) * sqrt(66) = sqrt(264)
= 2*sqrt(66)So that’s how you get 2*sqrt(66)–hope that helps!
Table of Contents | See Pricing
Verbal Videos: Sentence Correction | Critical Reasoning | Reading Comprehension
Quant Videos: Problem Solving | Data Sufficiency -
GMAT Prep Question From Student
Number Properties – GMAT Prep Quant Question
“I can’t seem to figure out how the GMAT arrived at the answer to this question on a GMATPrep test . Can you assist?”
Q: The function f is defined for all positive integers n by the following rule: f(n) is the number of positive integers each of which is less than n and has no positive factor in common with n other than 1. If p is any prime number, then f(p) =
A) p – 1
B) p – 2
C) (p+1)/2
D) (p-1)/2
E) 2The answer is p-1. Why is the answer not 2?
Thanks,
GMAT Pill Response
Just pick any prime number like 7 or 11.
Say 7. f(7) = # of positive integers less than 7. Well, there are 6 positive numbers less than 7: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6.
But it also has to have no positive factor in common with 7 other than 1.
So just go through the list: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6—–compare them each with 7 and 1 like so:7 and 6: Do they share no positive factor other than 1? Yes.
7 and 5: Do they share no positive factor other than 1? Yes.
7 and 4: Do they share no positive factor other than 1? Yes.
7 and 3: Do they share no positive factor other than 1? Yes.
7 and 2: Do they share no positive factor other than 1? Yes.
7 and 1: Do they share no positive factor other than 1? Yes. The only factor that 7 and 1 have in common is 1. So yes, this counts as one also.And the above up and basically all the numbers work between 1-6 so since 6 is one less than 7, then the answer is 1 less than n.
So answer is p-1. Hope that helps!
Zeke
GMAT Scoring – Your 4 Scores On The GMAT Score Report
GMAT Test Dates – About the GMAT Test DatesTable of Contents | See Pricing
Verbal Videos: Sentence Correction | Critical Reasoning | Reading Comprehension
Quant Videos: Problem Solving | Data Sufficiency
-

Introduction -
Video Trailer
-
Student Success
-
Your MBA






